Neural field models for latent state inference

The final paper from my Edinburgh postdoc in the Sanguinetti and Hennig labs (perhaps, we shall see). 

[get PDF]

We combined neural field modelling with point-process latent state inference. Neural field models capture collective population activity like oscillations and spatiotemporal waves. They make the simplifying assumption that neural activity can be summarized by the average firing rate in a region.

High-density electrode array recordings can now record developmental retinal waves in detail. We derived a neural field model for these waves from the microscopic model proposed by Hennig et al.. This model posits that retinal waves are supported by an quiescent, active, and refractory states. 

Fig 3. Spatial 3-state neural-field model exhibits self-organized multi-scale wave phenomena. Simulated example states at selected time-points on a [0,1]² unit interval using a 20×20 grid with effective population density of $\rho{=}50$ cells per unit area, and rate parameters $\sigma{=}0.075$, $\rho_a {=} 0.4$, $\rho_r {=} 3.2 \times 10^{−3}$, $\rho_e {=} 0.028$, and $\rho_q {=} 0.25$ (Methods: Sampling from the model). As, for instance, in neonatal retinal waves, spontaneous excitation of quiescent cells (blue) lead to propagating waves of activity (red), which establish localized patches in which cells are refractory (green) to subsequent wave propagation. Over time, this leads to diverse patterns of waves at a range of spatial scales. 

Optogenetic stimulation shifts the excitability of cerebral cortex from type I to type II

Our new paper, Heitmann et al. [get PDF], is finally out! It's a collaboration between the theoretical neuroscientists Stewart Heitmann and Bard Ermentrout at the University of Pittsburgh, and the Truccolo lab at Brown University. 

This work could help us understand what happens when we stimulate cerebral cortex in primates using optogenetics. Modeling how the brain responds to stimulation is important for learning how to use this new technology to control neural activity.

Optogenetic stimulation elicits gamma (~50 Hz) oscillations, the amplitude of which grows with the intensity of light stimulation. However, traveling waves away from the stimulation site also emerge. It's difficult to reconcile oscillatory and traveling-wave dynamics in neural field models, but Heitmann et al. arrive at a surprising and testable prediction: 

The observed effects can be explained by paradoxical recruitment of inhibition at low levels of stimulation, which changes cortex from a wave-propagating medium to an oscillator. 

At higher stimulation levels, excitation overwhelms inhibition, giving rise to the observed gamma oscillations. 

Many thanks to Stewart Heitmann, Wilson Truccolo, and Bard Ermentrout. The paper can be cited as:

Heitmann, S., Rule, M., Truccolo, W. and Ermentrout, B., 2017. Optogenetic stimulation shifts the excitability of cerebral cortex from type I to type II: oscillation onset and wave propagation. PLoS computational biology, 13(1), p.e1005349.